The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close, as target of this discussion is the talk page. I believe this was an accident on the nominator's part, especially since s/he used Twinkle. Will open a proper discussion on the article momentarily. Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:J. X. Williams

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a pseudonym used by porn writers in the 1960s. The current article has repeatedly be re-written to conform to a art project one Noel Lawrence created, whereby he recut old films and gave lectures claiming they were the work of this fictional character. See refs on talk page. The content of this seems to be part of this "art project", persistently recreated. Actual subject of dubious notability. T L Miles (talk) 21:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Close and re-nominate correctly Did you mean to nominate the article, or the talk page? Talk page nominations go on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion but I'm guessing you meant to nominate J. X. Williams. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:25, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see somebody's already posted on the nominator's talk page to ask about this. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.