The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. – Joe (talk) 14:02, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tamarack Developments Corporation

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional, does not pass WP:NCORP. ––FormalDude talk 16:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ––FormalDude talk 16:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ––FormalDude talk 16:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion: previously PRODded.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I added a couple of references - not hard to find media articles about the company after 30+ years. The second reference I added was a press release - but it describes the information well, and there are other media articles that cover this Nfitz (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Nfitz: I reviewed the references and there are currently only two live media articles sources that covers the corporation. Can you provide the other ones that cover them? ––FormalDude talk 03:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@FormalDude: I'm not sure what you mean about "live". The proquest ones are accessible to all editors through the Wikipedia library. Or do you want me to add more references - which given that the period of notability was decades ago, are going to be firewalled. Nfitz (talk) 15:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.