The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Technology of The Saga of Seven Suns (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced plot summary and OR, no indication of real-world notability. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 17:44, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:28, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:25, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Your typical example of fictional cruft. Not notable, per nom._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Strikes me as a legitimate spinout from a potentially overlong article on a lengthy series of novels. Needs work, but that's not grounds for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 19:08, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Wolfowitz. James500 (talk) 07:53, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.