The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 15:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tenma Shibuya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:NACTOR. Subject of the article fails the primary inclusion criteria. No significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources to establish its notability. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 09:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 18:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 18:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Michitaro (talk) 02:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I hereby withdraw my nomination to Keep the article since notability has been established. I'm closing this debate to prevent a waste of time of other editors. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 15:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.