The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#G3. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 20:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Texas Spinning Hound[edit]

Texas Spinning Hound (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Hoax dog breed. Google has never heard of it. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 01:10, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:HOAX. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:HOAX, WP:NOT a place for you to take a picture of your dog and decide it's its own breed. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:47, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a master of internet coding, but I am a master of genetic composing. The goal of this article is to introduce a new breed to the Dog family. I have spent years trying to validate its importance. I was hoping to find a more scholarly forum...not restricted to the finite realm of "Google." But, then again...what can one truly expect to affect on the Internet... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinninghound (talk • contribs) 05:29, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a peer-reviewed journal on canine genetics. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - friendly looking dog though :-) CultureDrone (talk) 07:11, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete judging by author's comments, original research more literally than usual... Nice dog though -Hunting dog (talk) 11:47, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as original research. Wikipedia is not the place to debut the description of a new dog breed. We are only supposed to include in this encyclopedia topics that have already been noted previously elsewhere. If this breed is formally recognized, or even if not formally recognized becomes discussed in the media, we may be able to include an article about it at that time. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Hoax upon hoax upon hoax on. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 18:10, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• G3 Clear hoax. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.