The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – sgeureka ^t•c 07:24, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Fast and the Feathery / The Fowl Friend

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable article which is essentially a reguritation of the plot without third person sources therefore it should be deleted. It falls under WP:PLOT Dwanyewest (talk) 06:37, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's no reason for this to have an entry. At the most it should be a redirect to the series itself. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete poorly written in-universe fancruft. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:58, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.