The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:08, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Fry Bread House[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails notability. a local Phoenix restaurant with one location. no coverage except trivial local restaurant coverage. it's one "claim to fame" is a mention in 2012 as one of five "American Classic" restaurants, which I don't find compelling. MB 22:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:GNG as having significant coverage that extends beyond its Phoenix, Arizona locale. I've added a Boston Globe article and a book reference, as well as adding references from other reliable sources. A significant indicator of notability is that the restaurant won the 2012 James Beard American Classic Award and, out of the five restaurants chosen that year, it was the only (and the first) Native American restaurant to win that recognition. The owner is a member of the Tohono O'odham Nation of Native Americans. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 17:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the award and significance of winning for this restaurant is not fame claim. As a stubbed article with coverage outside location, this meets WP:GNG. Note that buzz words in the introduction border on spamming this. Burroughs'10 (talk) 23:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.