The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 23:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Sulfuro Bhangarh Manuscripts

[edit]
The Sulfuro Bhangarh Manuscripts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-published book on Lulu.com with no assertion of notability per Wikipedia:NBOOK, and no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Proposed deletion contested by creator. Filing Flunky (talk) 12:02, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Filing Flunky (talk) 12:02, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 14:02, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 20:27, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, plenty of hits from Amazon, Smashwords and Lulu - all self-publishing Meccas. No hits whatsoever from mainstream press reviews, other books, trade press or journals, or any other reliable sources. Yunshui  00:11, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.