- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The no.1 Shoal of China Vacation Area resort[edit]
- The no.1 Shoal of China Vacation Area resort (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article should be deleted as it fails WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE as the whole article is written as a travel guide for a beach. -KAP03 (talk) 21:13, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- delete. Seems to be just a local beach. Searching on the name turns up nothing, the address cannot be found, and the coords were completely wrong, miles inland. But I pulled an address, 广东省茂名市茂港区海滨二路, from one of the sources and it finds a coastal location where there is this: China No.1 Beach Danshuiyu, 中国第一滩. Just a local beach in Dianbai District, nothing special, not notable.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 09:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- On fixing the coords I noticed the Chinese name is in the article, which would have saved me some time if I had noticed it earlier. The English is full of errors and poor writing; if you want to find sources best to search on the Chinese name, or on "China No.1 Beach Danshuiyu" which turns up a few things.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 10:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Badly overwritten in a peacock style, there are no sources that proves this place is notable. It seems to be a local, ordinary beach. It's certainly no Bali or Boracay. Bearian (talk) 19:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.