The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Kerwin

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by a blocked user. Only two references are being used as primary sources. One reference is a basically a WP:SPAM website containing personal contact information, and the other, a Wikipedia article being mirrored as a source per WP:CIRC. I could only find one news article about this person, but overall, does not meet WP:BIO JudeccaXIII (talk) 20:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, reads like a promotion piece and not notable for stand alone article per GNG. Kierzek (talk) 22:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable architect.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:21, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.