The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW. postdlf (talk) 16:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the 2014 Crimean crisis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is a content fork of 2014 Crimean crisis. The latter is already in a very "newsy" format, and I do not think it's desirable to have to manage two pages of similar scope, not to mention the related 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine article and the overlaps these two articles have with Euromaidan. Ohc ^¡digame! 12:35, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There was a discussion for splitting the timeline on the talk. Timelines for major current events are notable. There's Timeline of the Euromaidan, Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (January–April 2013), and Timeline of the Russia–Georgia war.--Rurik the Varangian (talk) 13:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep People need to understand what happened when, and a timeline is the most convenient way to present that information.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 15:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ohc has nominated a related article, International reaction to the 2014 Crimean crisis, for deletion. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reaction to the 2014 Crimean crisis.--Rurik the Varangian (talk) 18:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Consensus was to split, is well-sourced. Issues of exactly what should overlap with what are reasons to be hashed out on talk pages, not via wholesale deletion. JoshuaZ (talk) 19:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We cannot put all of the details on here on to the 2014 Crimean crisis article, it would be overwhelmed. I hope that this article will be maintained. It has had little activity so far (perhaps because the crisis is cooling down). --Tocino 05:29, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is on an ongoing event, so its obviously going to read a bit like a news report. This is an issue that can be fixed through editing.Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:24, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Best source for many is this page. 88.250.71.19 (talk) 00:04, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for all the reasons stated above. Orser67 (talk) 15:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.