The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete per CSD G3. Nakon 21:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No sources given, and from a cursory Google search, can't even verify that this person exists. Amakuru (talk) 00:27, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep - This article should definitely not be deleted!-India89 — Preceding undated comment added 06:27, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, since you'd like to keep this article, it is possible to provide some evidence and sources which mention this person? At the moment I can't find any sources, and he does not seem to be notable (or maybe even exist). Amakuru (talk) 10:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete as an obvious hoax replete with inconsistency (first saying he played for Cambodia and then that Cambodia doesn't have a team), incredibility (a batsman making 999 and a player from Cambodia getting selected for an IPL team with the press not hearing about it) and impossibility (getting Ricky Ponting out three times in one match [a batsman can't be out more than twice in a match]). Phil Bridger (talk) 17:44, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete - WP:BULLOCKS!!! There isn't a chance in heck that somebody would be selected to play for an IPL club and manage to avoid any sort of press coverage whatsoever, including unreliable blogs. -- Whpq (talk) 18:09, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
DeleteWP:SNOW and WP:CSD#G3. We don't need to let this sit here any longer. If some statements in the article were true, it'd be a remarkable achievement to not receive any coverage. —SpacemanSpiff 20:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete - Cambodia doesn't even have a national cricket team.... why am I saying that???? It's clearly a hoax!!! Terminated! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:01, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment. I've tagged the article for speedy deletion as a blatant hoax. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:32, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.