The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Toaero UAV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article covers a category of products from a specific manufacturer in a way that runs afoul of WP:NOTCATALOG; the page essentially reads like a product line directory. Through searching I have not found evidence that either the product line or the manufacturer, Tianjin Toaero Science and Technology Co., pass WP:SIGCOV. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 23:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• delete. Did a search and after this page results were very sparse; seems the products exist in specialised catalogues but nothing approaching the mainstream coverage needed for notability, for the firm or its products.--2A00:23C8:4583:9F01:C1CA:C8E0:1243:B0C1 (talk) 23:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I can't find significant coverage of this line of UAVs. Ajpolino (talk) 04:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. The article notes, "Toaero UAVs are Chinese UAVs developed by Tianjin Toaero Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (Toaero, 天津中翔腾航科技有限公司) for various applications such as aerial cinematography, photography, and survey missions."

  I was unable to find significant coverage about the subject in my searches for sources. The subject fails Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline.

  Cunard (talk) 08:12, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.