The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 03:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trapped In Static[edit]

Trapped In Static (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Band looks to fail WP:NBAND, created by WP:SPA. Lots of social media refs but I can't find sufficient reliable sources to support the article. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:20, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:20, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia these should be considered reliable sources for which they meet more then 1 of the criteria that are required to identify them as notable - specifically criteria 9,10,11 and 12 are mentioned below:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3132796/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxz38wDiw88

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvGXmNo5ywI

http://www.mtv.com/artists/trapped-in-static/

https://artistsignal.com/discover/our-winners

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2204922/
https://vimeo.com/ondemand/6476/78423661 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Outliner (talkcontribs) 03:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Outliner: Thanks for working to find sources for this. I'd still recommend reading WP:RS, though. Sites that rely on user-contributed content like imdb, youtube, and vimeo are almost always (and in fact always in the case of imdb) considered unreliable. What we need are things like newspaper articles about a trailer that talks about them, magazine articles about the movie, blog posts on well known websites, coverage in books, etc. The artistsignal award and the cable tv appearance may be meaningful, but I don't think the others will have much sway here. Although I do not ultimately decide this, I can say pretty confidently that with the current sourcing the band will be deemed not notable enough yet (maybe WP:TOOSOON). --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhododendrites: I read the article, thanks again for the tips. Below is some more information.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxz38wDiw88

http://www.trappedinstatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/revmag-preview.jpg

http://mi2n.com/press.php3?press_nb=164739

...It seems that I found numerous other bands that definitely have less references then this band here, not sure how those bands are still on wikipedia...I will keep looking for more sources, thanks again. On a last note, the TV show should be quite a big one since it is on a national network, the video is posted on the hostess's youtube account and it does cover one of the criteria (n.12) required to identify them as notable

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 10:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 04:48, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.