The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 05:20, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tribunal Records

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be a notable record label. A news search brought up this, which I'd question as being a reliable source. Doesn't appear to be anything else out there. There are a bunch of artists at List of Tribunal Records artists, but at least one of those is also sitting at AfD, one is tagged notability, and one goes to an unrelated article. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:37, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete zero references in the article and I'm not finding any in Google news, books or web searches. No indication of how this is notable. This is especially problematic since band articles often use the notability of their label as demonstration of notability of the band. RadioFan (talk) 15:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Owner of label is also lead vocalist for Killwhitneydead, also being considered for deletion. 99.137.210.226 (talk) 15:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG.
Delete - As usual, record labels especially indie ones won't always receive the best coverage but I have to say this one received more than I expected. A search with "Matthew Rudzsinki" provided some results and a search with "Tribunal Records North Carolina" also provided some results in the first three pages. It seems they're best known for Killwhitneydead. Searches at Google Books only provided one brief mention of the label. Not much of an article could be built with these sources. SwisterTwister talk 17:44, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - I moved my notion to a Strong Keep after finding this, [1] A simple Google search pulls up two pages worth of information on the label, nearly 20 different sites referencing them. Looking at their list of artists shows quite a few notable bands. For me the Google search alone is enough reason to keep this page. Going through a few of the sites gives more than enough information to add to this page and clean it up. Here is a reference for the kind of articles and coverage they are getting [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thekingofdallas (talk • contribs) 02:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.