The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete -- No need to merge. Tubular tyres are no more related to bicycles as they are to other types of ground vehicles. Redirect to Tire, if anything. --Millbrooky (talk) 06:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC) Per comment below, it seems I don't know what I'm talking about. I'll abstain from this vote, then. --Millbrooky (talk) 15:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I've seen nominations like this before. Common objects articles that are still in the stub stages and a misguided user believes the topic is un-encyclopedic because so far they see only a "definition." Not only does its commonness make it encyclopedic (can easily be expanded to its history and variations plus many other details), but as Colonel Warden pointed out, it's the subject of secondary coverage included an whole book, the primary criteria of WP:N. --Oakshade (talk) 15:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hard to believe someone would write a whole book about a type of tyre but there we are. harris 578 (talk) 22:12, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.