The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. apparent consensus of reliable editors DGG ( talk ) 18:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tune Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

Don't know if I'm the only one who thinks this is a hoax. Nothing could be found about this person. the claim that he is the "nephew of Nigerian musician 2Face Idibia and great-nephew of Oba Ogundipe Arapasowu I, the 39th Olubadan (Lord of Ibadan)" is laughable. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Hey Oluwa2Chainz, you made a good point. Although Tune Day has claimed to be related to the late Olubadan, there is no information online that can be sourced to validate such a claim, so in accordance to the rules, all references to it have been removed. Thanks for calling it to our attention. Aside from that, the reason you may find it tough to find information about Tune Day is that most of his information seems to be under Tunde Junior, which is an alias used in many of his viral videos available online. Similar to how Drake used to go by Drizzy casually. Hope this helps a bit. Lastly, i've added two more references to show proof of the relation to 2Face Idibia. There was even an article on a blog when 2Face Idibia's kids were staying at Tune Day's family home in the states a few years back. Trying to find that as well for you. Lilsonic (talk) 12:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC) REMOVED BLOCKED EDITOR !VOTE[reply]

• Keep. Update: I've found two sources that support what I referenced above. As you can see herehttp://www.mjemagazine.com/photos-from-2faces-son-zion-celebrates-5th-birthday/ and here http://africanspotlight.com/2013/01/16/photos-2face-and-sunmbo-ajaba-celebrate-sons-birthday/ , Nino and Zion (both of 2Face Idibia's kids) regularly visit Tune Day's family home in Connecticut with their mother Sunmbo (Tune Day's aunt). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilsonic (talk • contribs) 12:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Lilsonic you are only alowed to !vote once at AfD. I have stricken your duplicate !vote. Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:25, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I've figured out why you might think this is a hoax page Oluwa2Chainz. I assure you it's not. For some reason, the results you're looking for can only be found if you search the web for Tune Day's alternate name Tunde Junior, as sometimes publications credit him with that name. To show you what I mean, please click the Find Sources bar below.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

You can see that Google is showing all information about Tune Day via the alternate name/alias Tunde Junior (which is also referenced in the article)https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Tunde+Junior%22https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Tunde+Junior%22&biw=1218&bih=587&tbm=vid&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiYqs26o57QAhXL8CYKHZK_C3cQ_AUICigD&dpr=1#q=%22Tunde+Junior%22&tbm=nws] , from video interviews to music releases. It's all there. Hope this adds some clarity.Cloudcartel (talk) 13:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)REMOVED BLOCKED EDITOR !VOTE[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:25, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment both accounts that !voted keep are confirmed socks per this SPI.—Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 18:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Removed references to 2Face Idibia. 94.103.175.86 (talk) 19:45, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. i remember this video trending everywhere when it came out. even right now, the video is still a meme of sorts.https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=i%27m%20from%20brooklyn%20killed%20biggie&src=typd Taxstone is somewhat popular here and he even dedicated a podcast episode to this guy.https://soundcloud.com/taxseason/tax-season-episode-7 Made him trend for a whole month on twitter and the gram. Seems pretty notable, especially for social media standards. it's probably a bigger thing in the states than anywhere else but here i've definitely seen this dude pop up. 91.109.30.89 (talk) 23:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Wow, there are a lot of interesting !votes here. Unfortunately, the support for the article comes from either Blocked or Anom editors. Discounting that, the article contains a number of references; however, the references are for unrelated topics, not for the artist in question, from YouTube, or from Twitter. There are no in-depth articles about the artist in question. Given that I have to !vote to delete. reddogsix (talk) 16:35, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Most of the keep votes are from sockpuppets/anon IPs, and don't provide policy-based reasons for there votes. As noted above, most of the "references" aren't actually about him, or only mentions him briefly. The coverage is not sufficiently in-depth to pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 22:26, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep :: Cross-checking the references from independent sources, it seems the coverage of this article is validated in multiple reliable places. Digital Trends, HotNewHipHop and VIBE especially aren't small-time publications by any means, but each site seems to have not just referenced him, but actually featured him. I see the sockpuppetry/anon IPs mentioned above which raises concerns but, the article seems to have been revised to reflect the suggestions of the voters. Also, the WP notability guidelines seem to cover such an article based on my earlier points. I say it's worth a keep, or a few revisions to remove any thing that doesn't mention the article outright. ScooterbeeZy (talk) 03:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC).— ScooterbeeZy (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Comment - The article still lacks non-trivial support.reddogsix (talk) 04:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as everything listed is trivial and unconvincing, and nothing else is being offered here as better substance and improvements, instead simply emphasizing there's nothing to improve, enough said. SwisterTwister talk 04:51, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Mentioning that the article lacks non-trivial support here backs up my suggestion above regarding a few revisions. Such as, making improvements to the article. No one said there is nothing to improve, at all. What would either of you suggest as an improvement? I suggested removing any references that don't mention the article outright, if you look above. ScooterbeeZy (talk) 05:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Removing unrelated "references" does nothing to add support to the article. I happen to agree with ST. How about adding non-trivial support, you think? reddogsix (talk) 05:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - @ScooterbeeZy: The sources provided say nothing about the subject.—Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 06:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Wow, a lot of references... but these references are all either trivial mentions that don't even state who the subject IS, or where there is good information, the source is completely unreliable (reddit and imdb, for example, are definitely not reliable references). I did a google news search for "Tunde Ogundipe" and came up with nothing. I also searched for ("Tune Day" +dj), which comes up with nothing. ("Tune Day" +music) comes up with an article that has a record of someone tweeting "TUNEDAY!" in relation to a completely different artist, and the article calls it a meme, but doesn't explain it ([1]). I searched for ("Tune Day" +actor), and came up with nothing. I even searched for ("Tune Day" +nigerian) and found nothing. After all this, plus the offhand reference to being a meme, I can't even firmly confirm that this is a real person, or if it's just something the internet made up one day on a lark, as the internet is oft wont to do.

I would be willing to change my !vote on the condition that someone can provide the existence (inclusion in article not necessary) of at least two references from reliable (non-user generated, bylined under 2nd party editorial review) non-local sources that contain a substantial mention. I don't necessarily need an entire article about the subject, but at the very least, the mention needs to identify the subject, and why the subject is notable. Fieari (talk) 00:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.