The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. A Train^talk 07:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish-Kurdish Regional Government Economic Trade Relations[edit]

Turkish-Kurdish Regional Government Economic Trade Relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a well-sourced essay or analytical paper, instead of an encyclopedia article. Chetsford (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment user's only non-sandbox edit to Wikipedia was creating this article. There's some good information here so I'm curious to see if anyone else thinks it could be saved in some sort of geography or international relations article. If not, delete per WP:NOTESSAY. SportingFlyer talk 00:22, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep this text, which is clearly an essay. Yet if it can be salvaged before the AfD time's up, we can perhaps keep it. The subject is most definitely a notable one. It concerns something more general that should be reflected in the title: I'd prefer "Turkish-Kurdish Regional Government Relations." But I do see the point made in the nomination. Let's wait for the weekend.-The Gnome (talk) 16:41, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Gnome - just to clarify for the closer, since the weekend is now over and no substantive changes have been made to the article, your !vote has transitioned to delete? Chetsford (talk) 21:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.