The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 19:20, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

URX (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP and significant RS coverage not found. What comes are is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. The company is now defunct so no further prospects for enhanced notability. Created by Special:Contributions/CAA_CAA_CAA with no other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:47, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I considered a partial merge into Pinterest#2013–2017:_Acquisitions, but then noted that a Pinterest spokesperson described it as an acquisition of the people more than the technology. Leaving aside the routine announcements, the Techcrunch item referenced in the article and a somewhat advertorial CRM Magazine case study  – via HighBeam (subscription required) appear to be the best available coverage of the company / product, but I don't think they are sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 11:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.