The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unify Square (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable and never was. The references are press releases and and notices of funding, and nothing more seems to be available. DGG ( talk ) 06:22, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:36, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:36, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No great sources for this company. Coin (talk) 22:55, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: An article describing a company's funding history and positioning of its products/services relative to Lync/Skype/Teams, etc. Aside from the announcement-driven coverage, there is the company's inclusion in a Gartner marketplace vendors list (paywalled), which might merit a mention in an article providing context on that sector, but I am not seeing the level of coverage of the firm itself to demonstrate notability here. AllyD (talk) 07:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.