The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:59, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Video 125 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:GNG due to lack of independent sources. Promo The Banner talk 15:55, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, non-notable production company for stand alone article; a passing interest or local interest at best. Kierzek (talk) 17:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as non-notable company. There is only one source which is their own website "About us". Fuortu (talk) 11:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No WP:RS found. Cabayi (talk) 12:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, could not find any sources except their website and stores offering their videos for sale. Need at least one write-up in a small paper, or something. Herostratus (talk) 18:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm unable to find any third party sources. Sorry but this is far from satisfying WP:CORPDEPTH. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:57, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.