- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Vikas Shakya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Indian "model, choreographer and social media influencer", signally fails WP:GNG - was deeply tempted to go G11 with this. Hair color Black, eye color Brown, apparently... Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:47, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and India. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:47, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep the subject is notable as many secondary source have covered him. India Today, The Telegraph, Zee News, ABP News are all national level media houses of India. Also, infobox for the model provides the parameters like eye colour and height etc. Also, we have similar articles on model on Wikipedia for years. Please see, he is a winner of India's national level beauty pageant title. Similar articles are here:- Vishnu Raj Menon, Jitesh Singh Deo etc. There are 10 good quality source, covering the subject, and there are many articles on Wikipedia with 2-3 source. PS: All source talks about the subject, no passing mention.-Admantine123 (talk) 07:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:41, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: clearly fails in WP:GNG nd no any secondery reliable source. only PR stuff Worldiswide (talk) 06:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Jitesh Singh Deo exist on Wikipedia even with less number of sources. The source in this article is discussing about the subject, not passing mention. 8 sources (all are WP: SECONDARY) that too of national level media houses are enough for fulfilling WP:GNG.-Admantine123 (talk) 09:23, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- You can also nominate that one for deletion, it also appears as non-notable as this person. Thank you for pointing it out. Oaktree b (talk) 19:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I nominated it, I don't think it's notable, with the sourcing available at least. Oaktree b (talk) 20:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Source analysis please
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 21:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:54, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Admantine123, I'm striking your duplicate votes, you can only cast one "vote". Please abide by this practice in AFD deletion discussions. Everyone else does. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Its ok Admantine123 (talk) 04:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep He have won National level award and the article fulfills the Wikipedia Criteria. TheProEditor11 (talk) 17:43, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment- some serious WP:BLUD is going on here by Admantine123. Voting “strong keep/speedy keep” three times and then replying to everyone who votes delete is seriously disruptive to the AfD process. GraziePrego (talk) 03:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The Telegraph article is sponsored content, so a no-no. The rest appears as fluffy as it. Winning a Josh TRENDSETTER award is not notable, and I'm not even sure what that is to be honest. This is PROMO. Oaktree b (talk) 19:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- This is typical of the language: Vikas Shakya - A new dazzle in the realm of buzz world [[2]] flowery language, not using correct English sentences, staff writer... Very much PR fluff. Oaktree b (talk) 19:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Every references on the page with the exception of the 1st (which is a bio) fails WP:NEWSORGINDIA. These are PR pieces and do not count towards notability. I would welcome anyone pointing out some references that do not fall under NEWSORGINDIA and I would be happy to review and possibly change my vote. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Almost every sources are sponsored content. Fails the notability criteria.111.92.123.60 (talk) 18:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: BLP, Fails GNG and BIO. Clearly promotional. BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 16:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.