The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vineet Saini

[edit]
Vineet Saini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Maybe too early to be on Wikipedia. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration.

Dear Bonadea Please check Articles Source .I corrected them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musichimachal (talkcontribs) 11:58, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I don't make the decision on whether the article is kept or deleted - I can only weigh in in the discussion, like everybody else. There is still no claim to notability in the article, and the new source added is a blog, which does not qualify as a reliable source. --bonadea contributions talk 22:19, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Now Source are mentioned and links are claim to notability.It is proven that article information is true thank you. musichimachal 13:46, 28 December 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musichimachal (talkcontribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 18:11, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell 02:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.