The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:12, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vinith Misra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity page, built out of excerpts from the person's CV. Not linked to by any other Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inventingfacts (talk • contribs)

• Delete | The page does not appear to be of great relevance except one. Vivek Rai (talk)
• Procedural Note: This nomination was not transcluded for discussion and was missing the AfD Template. I have corrected both, please use the time of this comment as the listing time when closing. Monty₈₄₅ 03:06, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIOMgbo120 (talk) 19:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Quick delete. Not enough reliable sources to back up its notability. ImmortalWizard(chat) 23:49, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.