The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WR Entertainment[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated last month by Naturolovehinata5 and exactly today it was confirmed the authoring accounts were linked and this article itself is a clear advertisement, so multiple violations of our policies and multiple searches finding nothing else but announcements and mentions, which is exactly what these sources are; the fact this is barely 2 years old, there's simply not the shown substance for notability and what's listed is simply advertised information. SwisterTwister talk 21:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:CORPSPAM, fails WP:NCOMPANY. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 23:34, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was about to write an identical nomination for this. It's corporate spam from Single Purpose Accounts that were linked - a group of confirmed sockpuppets (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Weak81). The company does not meet WP:CORP, despite the best efforts of this group of editors. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 03:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 03:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 03:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 03:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH and the article is corporate spam. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 17:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spam should be viewed from stricter standards than the attempts of a good faith editor to create corporate articles. Fails WP:ORG. Lourdes 03:16, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.