The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per WP:SNOW. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WXDU[edit]

WXDU (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete per WP:NOT and WP:NOTE: Though someone has obviously but a good deal of effort into this article, Wikipedia is not a random collection of college clubs. Also, this organization has not demonstrated how it has externally-verifiable notability per WP:NOTE. None of the sources are secondary sources, which means they cannot establish notability. I'm sure WP:V is satisfied; if sources were brought to bear which were independent of the establishment, and a thorough purging (by fire, of course) of the article were to be had (ie, to not use all those citations to Duke), then this would be a keep, but as it is, the article does not meet the requirements for inclusion. DukeCleaner (talk) 13:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The station appears to be FCC licensed, and if I'm not mistaken, licensed radio stations are generally notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 14:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Nominator is a newly registered user whose only edits have been AfDs. Edit history and user name suggest a single-purpose account. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note In fact the IP editor 152.16.179.58 made this AfD and four others, all related to Duke and these are the only five edits by this IP editor - Dravecky (talk) 15:01, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Licensed broadcast radio stations are presumed notable and this one has been on the air for almost 60 years. It is marked for a substantial cleanup, its problems are not fatal. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep as this is a licensed broadcast radio station serving a large population and geographic area and, sa such, is presumed notable. This article needs cleanup but that's not an issue for AfD. - Dravecky (talk) 14:58, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep per Dravecky and Gene93k.--Winger84 (talk) 16:45, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep per Dravecky, Gene93k and Winger84 --Rtphokie (talk) 16:58, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep. Satisfies notability requirements for radio stations, including audience base and longevity; everything else is a content issue, not for AFD. The weather's starting to look a bit WP:SNOW-y. 23skidoo (talk) 18:00, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per established broadcast consensus. Article clearly needs work, but is not egregious content demanding a complete do-over. ~ Ningauble (talk) 18:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.