The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 20:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wang Hai Sheng

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same individual as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hai Sheng Wang. Pinging User:Nlu who participated in the first AFD. References 1-4 are either broken or unintelligible (at least to me), Ref 5 is a link to his book on Amazon.com (the book doesn't appear notable at all). Timmyshin (talk) 05:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 05:43, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 05:43, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 05:43, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - this qualifies for speedy deletion under the criteria WP:G4. -Zanhe (talk) 16:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not sure it qualifies for G4, since that was in 2015. Although that appears to be the most recent discussion so it might... regardless, still does not pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:13, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.