The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:15, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weimin Fan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Complete mess. Only reference is to own Web site. Given that the article also previously blatantly contained e-mail address, appears to be advertising. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 04:57, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Can't find any references to Weiman Fan other than refs to Wikipedia and own site. May be notable in non-English sources, though. --John Nagle (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete lack of sources. SalHamton (talk) 18:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.