The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 16:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wellers Auctioneers

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The reference provided with the article only mentions that something will be auctioned by the company--that's not surprising. I found no relevant hits on the interwebz that provide significant discussion of the company. Drmies (talk) 18:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, weakly. A firm established in 1866 is probably more entitled to the benefit of a doubt than most. But I am unable to scare up anything that looks like significant coverage in reliable sources. An auction house does not become notable by auctioning newsworthy or interesting objects; it's what they're for. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete non notable auction house, no significant TV coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seasider91 (talk • contribs) 11:02, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.