- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to Passengers of the RMS Titanic. Spartaz Humbug! 07:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Winnifred Quick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable passenger of the Titanic; minimal RS coverage outside of this single event. –dlthewave ☎ 16:40, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:04, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:04, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO1E, and WP:NOTINHERITED. There is no policy that the "oldest x" is notable and this article is packed with longevity fancruft like she was the oldest survivor of a particular disaster, was one of the five last survivors of said disaster, and her family tree. This WP:PERMASTUB is not needed, and she does not inherit the Titanic's notability just because she had the misfortune to be a passenger on the ship. Newshunter12 (talk) 05:51, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.