The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 14:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Workplace communication (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although I can not find the source, this article gives me the feeling that it is copied from somewhere else. Especially the end of the article gives me that impression. Night of the Big Wind _talk 23:25, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I will not judge something copyvio without evidence. I suspect it is more in the nature of a summary from the sources for the separate paragraphs. I've seen a lot of that lately--whether they are too close paraphrases cannot be determined without checking the printed sources. And it could just as easily have been written by someone who naturally writes in that sort of style. The topic is clearly notable, based on the list of books on the exact subject. DGG ( talk ) 05:40, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This can be improved. This is an essential global knowledge and notable as well. I would like to improve this in the near future, but not right now. Pmresource (talk) 06:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy close as keep I guess I had a bad day yesterday that I did not see that someone had screwed up the article. The original version of Kumargnana was okay, and now he has restored this version, the article is okay. So please close this nomination speedy as keep. Night of the Big Wind _talk 09:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.