The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:40, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wuhan New Era Football Club[edit]

Wuhan New Era Football Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claim of participation in Chinese FA Cup. Couldn't find any WP:RS to support it and fails WP:GNG ShunDream (talk) 14:18, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another reference is added.User:Luwuyi14:38, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Though I tried my best to fix the article by correcting the typographical errors and restructure the grammar but then I feel it fails WP:GNG and WP:RELIABLE Gghenn2 (talk) 14:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:04, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:04, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:05, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment is there really nothing in RS on this team? They made the third round of the Chinese FA Cup in 2015: [1] I'm not going to be able to find local references, though. SportingFlyer talk 00:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• All the references in Wuhan New Era Football Club are news reports except for reference 1 and 4. Hence, most of the references are reliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luwuyi (talk • contribs) 01:51, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as playing in the Chinese FA Cup makes notability very likely and there is already reliable soyrces coverage in the article, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:48, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as the article do not fail notability and it have reliable references.Luwuyi (talk) 10:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This citation and this citation are from WP:RS news outlets and are specifically about Wuhan New Era. Narky Blert (talk) 12:08, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep seems to pass WP:GNG after the work done on the article. SportingFlyer talk 05:38, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep appears to scrape through WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:28, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.