The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Xl dynamics

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any sources on the web that establish WP:CORPDEPTH for this outsourcing company. The article itself makes no claim to notability either, nor does it have any sources. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:15, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:55, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:55, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:55, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A careful research brought not enough independent or thid-party coverage about the subject, article seems to be purely promotional. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 18:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
User:Xumit posted the following to the talk page of this page. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"The article gives information about company, I am still gathering information about the company, so that it will look more informative than promotional." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xumit (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.