- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. But tag as advert. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Yemeksepeti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominated as overly promotional, but I'm not so sure. Orange Mike | Talk 23:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems large enough to be notable, also some independent coverage. South Nashua (talk) 20:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:32, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:32, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This needs work to get rid of the advertising aspect, but there is a wealth of hits from very reliable sources, such as the WSJ, The Daily Sabah, [Time] Digital Age (although I'm not sure if this isn't PR), CNN, and that's just on the first page of News. Onel5969 TT me 12:56, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.