The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Deleted under WP:G11. Please see closer comment for more detailed raionale. Shirt58 (talk) 08:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yilin Zhong

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating this article for deletion because of its notability, neutrality and style. This article reads like an advertisement. It definitely seems to be authored by its subject. Christap (talk) 22:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Has the nom considered speedy delete G11? I would say that would be plausible with mentions of in-stock information (External links: "All sold out on Amazon:..."). No significant sources outside of social networks, other online 'pedias, Amazon and passing mentions in totally unrelated news (possibly someone else with a same name). 野狼院ひさし _{Hisashi Yarouin} 07:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like a very long CV. I've tagged it with G11, but if that gets declined then I say Delete the article per nom and User:Hisashiyarouin above; no demonstration of notability w/ reliable sources. INeverCry 06:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
AfD closer comment: I have speedily deleted this article under G11. As well, I could find no reliable sources to support the assertions made in the article, both in English and in (I admit my knowledge of the language is rudimentary at best, and more honestly pretty much non-existent) Chinese. --Shirt58 (talk) 08:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.