The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) LibStar (talk) 22:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yip Ho Nung (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. No significant coverage. Nothing in gnews or gbooks. Gets 1 hit in Trove. LibStar (talk) 22:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, China, and Australia. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:10, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The reference of National Centre of Biography, Australian National University seems enough. National Centre of Biography definitely keeps the biography of notable persons only. We need to be considerate when trying to find digital reference of a person from last century. Cirton (talk) 08:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Agree with Cirton. Absolutely satisfies WP:ANYBIO#C2.1.3. Cabrils (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.