The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

youngStartup Ventures[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CORPDEPTH as existing articles have issues with WP:ORGIND, WP:MULTSOURCES, and WP:RS. Original article seems to be created to slander the organization but once that was cleaned up there was little of substance left.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanwaldorf (talk • contribs) 19:06, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Never actually added to any log of AfDs - will "relist" to today's log
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 04:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 January 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:24, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:10, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:10, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:11, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A company going about its business; I am not seeing the level of coverage needed to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 18:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the above, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:NCORP and GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.