The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zibad Rheum

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough context to tell what this article is about. Most of the content pertains to the genus Rheum. Lead suggests it's a particular species endemic to Iran; source at [1] talks about something that Google translates as rhubarb (although if it's a wild species, I suspect it may be Rheum ribes). At any rate, this article seems to be a fork of one of our other Rheum related articles, but I can't tell which one. Plantdrew (talk) 21:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now. I am unable to find any sources that support the existence of this particular "species" of the genus. I recommend leaving a query on the talk page of the main article and/or the relevant WikiProject - or simply a notification of the AfD on those talk pages ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:56, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The existence of this plant is not known, as it is not verifiable through reliable sources. Thus, this article should be deleted. RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 16:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.