The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keep voters have offered sources that were not addressed by the nominator or rebutted by anyone else. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:48, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zombie Awareness Month (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A poorly sourced article. The only sources that are not by the so-called Zombie Research Society consist of a joke article(1), an interview with the creator(7), an article which appearantly contains factual errors(5) and a blog(4). The only thing that could possible make it notable is source 8, but it's a part-interview article and not about the topic, but instead it is about a zombie apocalypse course and it does not mention Zombie Awareness Month at all. It fails WP:NEVENT, especially WP:INDEPTH. » Shadowowl | talk 11:36, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:11, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 07:38, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.