Operator: Smith609 (talk · contribs)
Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic
Programming language(s): PHP
Source code available: [1]
Function overview: Perform null edits to update category membership
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): Continuous
Estimated number of pages affected: A few per day
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Yes
Function details:
((cite doi))
call should be removed from the maintenance category((cite doi))
template won't be removed from the category until it is edited itself. Wikimedia does not associate the creation of the back-end template with the page affected. Therefore, pages can remain listed in the maintenance category for some weeks after they should have been removed. This causes the bot to run on the page many times, with two down-sides:
Non-BAG opinion - Is it necessary to submit a bot request for a bot task that only makes null edits? They're not even entered into the page history or are otherwise detectable at all (as far as I know), so it's not like we'd have any way of confirming that your bot is behaving correctly. As long as the frequency of null edits is reasonable and only when needed, my opinion would be that you don't need a BRFA. —SW— spout 03:24, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
prop=links
on the #ifexist-using page. Anomie⚔ 19:06, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]