The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:39, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Truly barebones; only two articles included. --Apostrophe 17:28, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename as nominated --Kbdank71 15:33, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Propose to adopt the naming standard "Parks in <country>" (although I would have no objection to "Parks of <country>" either). Most subcats already meet that standard; changes required for the list below. Radiant_>|< 17:21, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename as nominated, create "Gardens in..." as necessary --Kbdank71 15:33, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Most subcats refer to 'parks'. Some refer to gardens. Given the synonymity of the two, I'd prefer renaming the lot to refer to 'parks' for consistency. I would have no objection to renaming them all to 'parks and gardens', though. Radiant_>|< 17:21, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:27, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This category was created in one fell swoop over a year ago and promptly abandoned, with no further maintenance. There is no useful explanation as to the meaning or intent of the categorization; apparently it was intended as some internal housekeeping for a project page (not really a valid use for a category in the first place) but is now just clutter. Jgm 16:11, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep --Kbdank71 15:24, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:19, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This is a very mangled category. Most of its entries belong in category:general relativity, with general relativity being a theory of gravitation instead of gravity. The exceptions are the perturbation and precession articles, which are adequately categorized without being a part of this one. --EMS | Talk 14:41, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was upmerge --Kbdank71 15:16, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ummmm... yeah. Two entries, I don't know of any more. Over-categorisation at it's worst - SoM 12:40, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename as nominated --Kbdank71 15:13, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to match its parent ("Geography of the United States") and newly renamed children ("Geography of Alabama" etc.) categories. Martin 11:00, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus --Kbdank71 15:10, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus is that this subcategory of disambiguation is not helpful to our readers. —GraemeMcRaetalk 09:41, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:05, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus is that this subcategory of disambiguation is not helpful to our readers. —GraemeMcRaetalk 09:41, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename as nominated --Kbdank71 15:00, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to standard and more inclusive form as per parent category category:Buildings and structures in Sweden. CalJW 08:50, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 14:59, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
To be deleted. It overlaps with Wars of Ecuador, which is the proper name for the category. Andres C. 05:56, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename as nominated --Kbdank71 14:54, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
There are a number of states in Chinese history named Wei, and eventually (when I reach there chronologically, perhaps in a few months :-) :-() I will create a category of Category:Emperors of Northern Wei, and so "Emperors of Wei" should be preemptorily disambiguated. --Nlu 04:55, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus --Kbdank71 14:48, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
"Transnational corporation" is a synonym for "multinational corporation". On Wikipedia currently transnational corporation redirects to multinational corporation. This proposal establishes a naming convention for "Multinational corporations headquartered in _". Kurieeto 00:24, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]