< November 6 | November 8 > |
---|
The result of the debate was rename as nominated --Kbdank71 16:25, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Simply an English language error. These were intended to be about crime, not criminals. Rename all CalJW 00:54, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was merge. Martin 23:31, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate of far larger category:American scientists, which contains all the subcategories. Almost unused (20 is tiny in context). Parent would be category:American people by occupation if it had ever been properly categorised, grandparent would be Category:American people and subcategories all use "American". So let's continue the work of standardising these into normal English by merging this into Category:American scientists. CalJW 00:00, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename as nominated --Kbdank71 16:30, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This is a follow up to the recent proposal to rename category:Hawaiian geography to category:Hawaii geography for "consistency", which thankfully looks like failing. These categories currently use nouns as adjectives and it would be much better to make them all consistent with the convention used for national geography categories:
Rename all CalJW 23:13, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus --Kbdank71 16:22, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This category is too misleading and POV for many of the cases included inside it. Additionally, a number of the people listed are still alive, and allegations of espionage, however qualified, can easily be grounds for touchy defamation suits. Adding the "alleged" on there makes it clear that this is a category created by others, not Wikipedia. I also propose creating as a compliment category Category:Convicted Soviet spies, which is where we can separate out those who actually were labeled as such by a court of law. Fastfission 21:38, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename. Martin 23:32, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Let's keep up the recent progress towards standardising the American people categories in line with normal English usage, the parent category, and the great majority of the like categories by renaming:
The American television executives and personalities are already in the prevalent form, so it would be good to remove the inconsistency. Standardising the American people categories will encourage thorough categorisation by removing the hassle of needing to check which form is in use for each occupation. CalJW 19:56, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename. Martin 10:40, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Another example of the American habit of overlooking the existence of the other six billion of us. Rename Category:American writers by state because that's what it is being used for. CalJW 19:36, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep --Kbdank71 16:07, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Category is part of attempt to receate MySpace on Wikipedia. -James Howard (talk/web) 18:43, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Martin 10:43, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Cat is empty and served by Category:University of Maryland, College Park faculty -James Howard (talk/web) 18:32, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:02, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if this should be renamed or deleted outright, but the contemporary term "LGBT" is entirely meaningless when applied to Ancient Greek culture and myths. Radiant_>|< 16:45, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was listify --Kbdank71 15:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A rather strange name, as it's not the games that are LGBT. In fact many contemporary games (especially from Japan) contain one or more LGBT people, but it seems meaningless to list all of those as 'LGBT games' unless sexual preference actually has a bearing on the game's gameplay. I think this is better represented as a list with some annotation. Listify, but if kept please rename to "Computer and video games with LGBT characters" or thereabouts. Radiant_>|< 16:45, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename. Martin 10:14, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Following the trend to name American people cats using the descriptor 'American' as opposed to 'U.S.'. (Note: at present, the proposed cat exists as a "redirect") -Mayumashu 16:25, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep --Kbdank71 15:50, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
There is such a thing as over-categorization, especially as there will be inevitable arguments over who gets included. JW 16:05, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:48, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be an "anti-admin" category, and is not even properly labeled as a "wikipedia" category. The items in this category seem to be loosely connected. -Willmcw 07:56, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep and populate --Kbdank71 15:48, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Can't help thinking that this was once full or had the intention of being so but is currently empty. Any ideas? Not sure if needs deleting, more of a discussion point on what to do with it doktorb 04:04, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]