The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 19:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The category only refers to computer and video games and not any other kind of games. Pikawil 23:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 21:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"weather modification" name is acknowledged name for these topics. Example of a book "Weather modification by cloud seeding, A. S. Dennis, Int. Geophys. Series, vol. 24, 1980 Pflatau 22:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was redirect Category:Vocalists, rename others per nom. Conscious 04:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A few of the relevant categories use "vocalists", which seems to add little except an air of pretension. It is not normal usage and the great majority of the related categories use "singer".
The result of the debate was Rename Vote 3R 1D. Rename 2 for nom one for other, rename per nom. Vegaswikian 17:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedian user categories should have "Wikipedians" as part of their name. SCHZMO ✍ 21:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was speedy deleted (c3). Conscious 05:46, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Only one user in category, redundant with Category:Boston Red Sox fans. Associated with Template:User RSN which I also proposed for deletion. SCHZMO ✍ 21:19, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 18:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC) Empty. Not exactly sure what a "Google alumnus" is. SCHZMO ✍ 21:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete user vanity cats. Syrthiss 20:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This category is associated with Template:User College Confidential, which was proposed for deletion here as a redlink Userbox referring to a non-notable subject. SCHZMO ✍ 21:04, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the new one that someone is working on. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Confidential
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 18:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC) Only 5 users in this category and unlikely to grow; Rebel Alliance is a non-notable forum with less than 150 members. Template:User RebelForums has already been deleted as linkspam. SCHZMO ✍ 20:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 21:18, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Two reasons: 1) US->United States; and 2) Similar format of other subcategories of Category:Government of the United States. —Markles 19:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was No consensus. Vegaswikian 21:42, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The old name didn't cover the extent of the category anymore. Category Talk:Upcoming television shows and Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Television#Poll Temporal Issues there was a debate on wether to seperate the future TV products into multiple categories, but it was decided a single category would suffice and therefor now a CFR to have the Cat name better reflect it's collection of articles. The DJ 19:50, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Reverse merge. Vegaswikian 18:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC) I don't see a distinction betwixt these two categories and would like to request they be merged. I have no preference/opinion as to which category should be retained. Deejayk 19:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename all. Vegaswikian 21:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 21:22, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 21:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 21:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 19:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Excessive categorization; little is gained by comparing albums by their position in musicians' release histories. Also, where do you stop once you start making these? And do you extend the system to other media? (Category:Novels by number?) (Note Category:Debut albums, Category:Second albums, and Category:Final albums are being kept.) –Unint 15:00, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 21:27, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rename/Merge all to conventional naming for Category:People by nationality sub-cat pages. Mayumashu 14:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Foreigners in the Philippines. Conscious 19:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Foreigners of the Philippines" sounds very awkward. Ultimately, we'll end up having all foreign nationals in the Philippines listed under this category. It would be more appropriate to use "Famous Foreign Nationals in the Philippines"
*Oppose Category names should never include the word "famous". I don't like this category name much though. Hawkestone 13:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep the renaming (ie. use of the word famous) is erroneous by conventions in place here. but there s no reason to delete as similar categories exist for other Asian countries (Category:Foreigners in Japan, Category:Foreigners in China). these are long-term residents to the country ('expatriates'), but non-citizens and therefore "foreigners". (the term expatriate may be a better choice, but the cat page should remain) Mayumashu 02:27, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Keep. Vegaswikian 21:46, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
most Filipino directors do work on television, film, theater and commercials. may be too restricting. 7258 13:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was merge from Category:Writers from the Philippines. Conscious 04:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Filipino writers" as a category is problematic since it is ambiguous. it may refer to the Philippines national language "Filipino." The problem is, the Philippines has at least 80 languages and many of these languages have their own literatures. Using "Filipino" to describe writers and literatures from the Philippines can be controversial, ambiguous and politically incorrect. Writers in the other Philippine languages may be offended. "Writers from the Philippines" is a more appropriate category to embrace all writers from the Philippines -- whether they are writing in that country's various literary languages: English, Filipino, Spanish, Tagalog, Ilocano, Bikol, Kapampangan, Hiligaynon, Cebuano, Kiniray-a and several others. This category does not offend those who are writing in the other Philippine languages.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Conscious 19:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
capitalization is incorrect. Esprit15d 12:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 21:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Correct series name is "Power Rangers" not "Power Ranger", and to keep in line with other subcats. Supermorff 12:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 18:51, 26 May 2006 (UTC) Unused. Conscious 11:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 21:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
At least rename to reflect the actual content of the category. Possibly delete altogether (this looks more like trivia than useful categorization). Conscious 09:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 18:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC) Empty, blanked by creator, redundant to Category:Tamil Sri Lankans. Conscious 08:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 18:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC) Already exists as Category:Fermented beverages. Webaware 08:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 21:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The category name should be more descriptive (see TSR) and match the name of the main article TSR, Inc. Conscious 08:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 18:57, 26 May 2006 (UTC) Another lamentable example of the American habit of assuming that the rest of the world doesn't exist, or if it does, it is too unimportant to be worth taking into account. The three subcategories do not fit into the wider United States category system and each of them contains only one state or city subcategory, and they are already in Category:Restaurants in the United States.[reply]
Delete all CalJW 06:42, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 21:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to concur with the format used for the other subcategories of category:regional geology. Sumahoy 03:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 21:36, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's a category for people who were involved in a single wrestling storyline. All of these people are already in appropriate categories involving pro-wrestling and the WWE, the category is just overly redundant. Toffile 03:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The following 4 entries are from the uncategorized categories list. -- ProveIt (talk) 00:29, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 21:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 18:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 19:01, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 19:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]