< July 15 July 17 >

July 16

Category:Sculptures in Italy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep.--Mike Selinker (talk) 23:11, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Sculptures in Italy to Category:Italian sculpture
Nominator's rationale: Merge. Technical nomination. Found doing cleanup as an apparent incomplete nomination. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:10, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have not seen that there is a parent cat. Category:Sculpture by region (Italy is not a region) before I created the cat. Now we have indeed two categories for the same topic. I would suggest to delete/merge to Category:Italian sculpture (redir.?) because categories in the English language Wikipedia edition should be plural. --Scriberius (talk) 04:06, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No: "sculpture" is for general articles, "sculptures" for individual ones. Johnbod (talk) 18:27, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:IOS (Apple)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Courcelles (talk) 20:25, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:IOS (Apple) to Category:Apple iOS
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Found as incomplete nomination doing cleanup. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Innocent Records albums

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator. Non-admin close. Cgingold (talk) 15:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Innocent Records albums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: redlink record label —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 20:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Monocrystals

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. — ξxplicit 00:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Monocrystals to Category:Crystals
Nominator's rationale: Merge. I was able to find another article for this category but I still think it will qualify under OC small. With a single parent, up merging seems like a logical option. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Film related Batman lists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 00:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Film related Batman lists to Category:Film-related Batman lists
Nominator's rationale: Grammar, possibly speedy. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 19:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Wow. I didn't even look at the articles themselves. List of objects used in the Batman film series? Yeesh. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 01:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Warner Bros. Batman films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. — ξxplicit 00:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Warner Bros. Batman films to Category:Batman films
Nominator's rationale: Overcategorization. There is only non-Warners studio film (with a couple of serials), so these can be safely upmerged. And since DC is owned by Warners, it's highly unlikely that any other studio will be producing Batman films. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 19:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pop soul musicians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. I'll review the contents afterward to remove any musicians who don't fit the term blue-eyed soul. — ξxplicit 21:57, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Pop soul musicians to Category:Blue-eyed soul musicians
Nominator's rationale: Merge. Pop soul redirects to Blue-eyed soul so the name of the category should match the parent. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 19:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Right. It appears the person who created the category (who has since been blocked indefinitely) was trying to create a modernized definition of the term, "pop soul". I am not against deletion of the category, but I think the category could exist with a "blue-eyed soul" definition with properly categorized articles. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 19:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hillsong albums

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. — ξxplicit 00:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Hillsong albums to Category:Hillsong Music albums
Nominator's rationale: This ambiguous name has resulted in albums from the Hillsong Church that were released on different labels (e.g. I Believe the Promise) categorized here. This needs to be split between the label Hillsong Music and the Hillsong Church as the artist. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 18:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Port settlements redux

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename Category:Port settlements in Oregon to Category:Port cities in Oregon and Category:Port settlements in Florida to Category:Port cities in Florida only. — ξxplicit 21:57, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements to Category:Port cities and towns
15 Additional Sub-categories
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements by continent to Category:Port cities and towns by continent
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in ancient Crete to Category:Port cities and towns in ancient Crete
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in Japan to Category:Port cities and towns in Japan
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in Argentina to Category:Port cities and towns in Argentina
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in Chile to Category:Port cities and towns in Chile
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in North America to Category:Port cities and towns in North America
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in Central America to Category:Port cities and towns in Central America
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in the United States to Category:Port cities and towns in the United States
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in Washington (U.S. state) to Category:Port cities and towns in Washington (U.S. state)
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in Oregon to Category:Port cities and towns in Oregon
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in Florida to Category:Port cities and towns in Florida
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in Mexico to Category:Port cities and towns in Mexico
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in Canada to Category:Port cities and towns in Canada
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in Ontario to Category:Port cities and towns in Ontario
Propose renaming Category:Port settlements in Quebec to Category:Port cities and towns in Quebec
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Before the Great Populated Places Migration of 2010, this ports nomination didn't gain any consensus on a plan. Now that "settlements" has been mostly eliminated from the category tree, and the structure "cities and towns" has been endorsed as a valid one, it seems logical to move the "Port settlements" categories to "Port cities and towns". If this passes, then it's possible we might even want to move all "Port cities" categories to "Port cities and towns" categories to be more inclusive. But that's another nomination, maybe. For now, this simple change seems a positive one.--Mike Selinker (talk) 18:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Port settlements in Oregon to Category:Port cities in Oregon
Category:Port settlements in Florida to Category:Port cities in Florida
Vegaswikian (talk) 08:23, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Professional Accountant

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. — ξxplicit 00:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Professional Accountant to Category:Accountancy qualifications
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Proposed title explains more clearly what the category is for. Fayenatic (talk) 18:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Insolvency law

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename both. — ξxplicit 00:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Insolvency law to Category:Insolvency
Propose renaming Category:Insolvency and corporate recovery law firms to Category:Insolvency and corporate recovery firms
Nominator's rationale: Simpler title for first category, matching lead article.
Second category name should reflect inclusion of other specialist insolvency firms e.g. accountants. Category should be de-populated of general large firms. Perhaps Category:Insolvency and corporate recovery specialist firms or just Category:Insolvency specialist firms would be clearer, to avoid the Big Four auditors etc being added? - Fayenatic (talk) 18:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Companies of Nagorno-Karabakh

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete and merge as nominated. — ξxplicit 00:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose deleting Category:Companies operating in Nagorno-Karabakh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose merging Category:Companies based in Nagorno-Karabakh to Category:Companies of Nagorno-Karabakh
Nominator's rationale: Merge 'based in' category to the standard form of the 'companies of' category tree. It is overcategorization to categorize companies by where they operate, so delete the 'operating in' category. (No articles will be left uncategorized). Tassedethe (talk) 16:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:House of Kicks Records albums

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 00:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:House of Kicks Records albums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Redlink label with just a redirect in the category. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 16:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Unlimited Mobile Phone Companies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 00:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Unlimited Mobile Phone Companies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Companies are not categorised by the specific type of payment options they offer. Tassedethe (talk) 16:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Historical characters in Wuxia fiction

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 00:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Historical characters in Wuxia fiction (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Overcategorization, irrelevant to the listed subjects. Most of those people have been used as characters in hundreds if not thousands of fictional works, which makes the relation unsuitable for categories. Also compare a recently deleted analog case. --Latebird (talk) 07:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Solar electricity companies of the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Solar energy companies of the United States and further differentiate as needed.. This may not be the perfect category for some contents, so other categories may need to be created.--Mike Selinker (talk) 03:47, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Solar electricity companies of the United States (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Seeing the name, one would assume that this is a useful category about companies producing solar electricity. Well, that is not what this is being used for. It is for companies that produce items that can be used by others to build systems that can be used to generate electricity from solar. Better to delete and start over. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Compilation albums of New Zealand music

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. — ξxplicit 00:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Compilation albums of New Zealand music to Category:Compilation albums by New Zealand artists
Nominator's rationale: Redundant. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 03:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Categories:People from Hempstead, New York

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename both. — ξxplicit 00:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: to match articles named Hempstead (village), New York and Hempstead (town), New York and disambiguate more clearly between the two Mayumashu (talk) 01:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.