< June 7 June 9 >

June 8

Category:List of Mister Rogers' Neighborhood seasons

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy renamed (C2A) per creator and sole editor's request. In the future, changes like this can go to WP:CFDS. The Bushranger One ping only 23:59, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category is for multiple lists, not a single one. DanTD (talk) 23:57, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1906 Summer Olympics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy rename C2D. Timrollpickering (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The article for this event has been at 1906 Intercalated Games since 2008. Courcelles 16:01, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Former Shropshire football clubs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy rename C2C. Timrollpickering (talk) 14:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename, to follow the format of the parent Category:Defunct football clubs in England, and to clarify that this category contains defunct footballs clubs in Shrophsire rather than that FCs which used to be in Shropshire but are now somewhere else.
See also a large group nomination at CfD 21012 June 6 on renaming the parent Category:Shropshire football clubs and 39 other other categs to the "Football clubs in countyname" format.
Note that although this categ currently contains only 3 articles, it has plenty of scope for expansion, and so does not violate WP:SMALLCAT. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 14:30, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Irish Roman Catholic archbishops

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus - And incidentally, it wasn't tagged either. - jc37 04:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The cat is related to the country, not the nationality. The cat is linked to the archbishoprics that are physically located in Ireland. Many of the archbishops listed are Cambro-Norman or English, not necessarily Irish nationals. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:02, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Ireland has been notified --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:23, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose for this category, is to specifically address the fact that the heirarchy in Ireland is divided, not by the state (as the Republic of Ireland), but on a per-island basis. By using 'Irish RC, all the bishops on the island can be considered Irish. By changing it to 'bishops in Ireland', the nom attempts to paper over this difference. It's an important distinction, which is why RC dioceses in GB used to be the name of the category. Since that got effectively overran, we now have RC dioceses in the ROI, and RC dioceses in the UK, which doesn't reflect the ecclesiastical division. It would be nice if we could restore the old cat name RC dioceses in GB, because then we could have RC dioceses in Ireland and RC dioceses in GB without the irritating category issues. What say ye, wikipedians?Benkenobi18 (talk) 08:09, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confused By the rationale offered above, user Benkenobi18 should advocate "Support". As he correctly states, the hierarchy in Ireland is on a per-island basis. The name for the entire island is Ireland. Also, the present title of "'Irish RC" would, as the user also points out, lead the reader to think that all the bishops could be considered to be Irish nationals. This, however, is not the case as many were English, Flemish, Norman, French, Spanish and Italian. To have a category of bishops that only contained Irish nationals, a new category mustbe created. Laurel Lodged (talk) 19:26, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Defunct cricket venues

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy rename C2C. Timrollpickering (talk) 14:54, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming:
Nominator's rationale: Rename all to match parent Category:Cricket grounds, and articles List of cricket grounds by capacity, List of Test cricket grounds. The current name follows the title of the other parent Category:Defunct sports venues, but it makes more sense to follow the terminology of the sport of cricket. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Cricket has been notified. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:10, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians having fun

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Timrollpickering (talk) 10:25, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: User categories should group editors on the basis of characteristics that are relevant to collaborative editing of the encyclopedia. This category does not do that. It serves merely as a bottom-of-the-page notice when, simply put, there is no reason anyone would need to browse this category in search of members. -- Black Falcon (talk) 06:21, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Users Who Sleep In Their Underwear

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. Clearly a joke category. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:53, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: User categories should group users on the basis of characteristics which are relevant to collaborative editing of the encyclopedia. This category does not do that, clearly. (It does, however, make me wonder about users who sleep in others' underwear.) It serves as little more than a humorous "bottom-of-the-page" notice. -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:35, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Deaths on the MV Princess Victoria

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge. Timrollpickering (talk) 10:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCATs with no significant potential for expansion that are not part of an established category tree. The Bushranger One ping only 04:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Water supply infrastructure in South Africa

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. The Bushranger One ping only 23:42, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:SMALLCAT. Not part of a larger scheme and there are sufficient categories that can contain the single page and two subcats. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 02:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Federation Architecture

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy rename (C2C) to Category:Federation architects. – Fayenatic London 18:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:Federation Architecture to Category:N/A
Nominator's rationale: Rename. This is an article in Category space. The content should be renamed to an article List of Federation architects. A new category could be created Category:Federation architects per Category:Architects by style. Tassedethe (talk) 00:54, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More