< February 27 March 1 >

February 28

Category:Sinch albums

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: For consistency with other categories that were renamed not too long ago (e.g. Category:Priestess (band) albums). LazyBastardGuy 22:42, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Environment in Brittany

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge as amended. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Merge. This does not seem to be a useful category as it only contains one article, The Singing Stones of Brittany, which is more an attraction than an environmental article. If editors think it should still be categories in environment, then upmerge to Category:Environment of France as well. – Fayenatic London 20:54, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Laws in Christianity

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to "Christianity and law in the xxth century". Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:16th-century laws in Christianity to Category:16th-century Christianity and law
  • Propose renaming Category:17th-century laws in Christianity to Category:17th-century Christianity and law
  • Propose renaming Category:18th-century laws in Christianity to Category:18th-century Christianity and law
  • Propose renaming Category:19th-century laws in Christianity to Category:19th-century Christianity and law
  • Propose renaming Category:20th-century laws in Christianity to Category:20th-century Christianity and law
  • Propose renaming Category:21st-century laws in Christianity to Category:21st-century Christianity and law
Nominator's rationale: Rename. The preposition "in" in the category name is not in line with the actual content of the categories: they're not about Christian laws but are instead about state law regarding Christianity. If a proposition must be kept in the category name, it should be changed into "about" or "regarding". The proposed category names are the most neutral form, without a preposition. Optionally, "law" may be changed into "state law". Marcocapelle (talk) 19:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're quite right. Support alternative per Beeswaxcandle. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Natural history of the Caribbean by islands

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Merge. There is no need for a separate category. Sort keys beginning with a space would be sufficient to separate the categories by topic from the categories by island. – Fayenatic London 19:08, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Names of God in Buddhism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:03, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The category currently includes two articles. Avalokiteśvara is a bodhisattva and Brahmā (Buddhism) is a deva; both Buddhist deities and classified as under that category. Category:Names of God has ways of addressing God like Bhagavan, Khuda, Holy Spirit etc; which is not what the category currently has Redtigerxyz Talk 17:42, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Editor2020, Talk 02:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Wiki-uk (talk) 17:09, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Tseghakronism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:05, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:SMALLCAT. The one article in this category has been sufficiently categorized, so no need to upmerge. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Editor2020, Talk 02:25, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Religion-related legal issues

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 08:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename, C2C to parent Category:Religion and government and sister category Category:Religion and politics. No longer C2C to parent Category:Legal issues but imho the terms "related" and "issues" should not be part of a category name anyway, being too vague. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:15, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nom. Editor2020, Talk 18:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:United Arab Emirates Wikipedia administration

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:11, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category contains 4 subcats - for portals, stubs, templates and wikiprojects. It thus places many pages that are not administration pages below Category:Wikipedia administration. It also causes circular categorization as Category:WikiProject United Arab Emirates is both a parent and a grandchild of this category. The subcats are all in more suitable parent categories. There is Category:United Arab Emirates articles by quality (which categorizes talk pages) and is the normal (and much more comprehensive) way to group pages of interest to a particular group of editors. Note: This category is one of 8 "<country> Wikipedia administration" categories, but there is no such category for the other 200+ countries (e.g. there is no "France Wikipedia administration" category). Related previous discussion: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_January_8#Category:Mauritius_Wikipedia_administration. DexDor (talk) 07:12, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More