This is one of the reasons we should not have huge flag-laden banners on talk page and in article editnotices browbeating editors with WP:OWNish claims that this page uses X English or that pages uses Y English so you'd better comply. Only someone with no linguistics training would buy into that nonsense. The Canadian one is particularly silly, because actual research into Canadian usage shows that it's a rather random mishmash of "American" and "British" and some Canadian dialect words, and varies widely throughout the country. All the other Commonwealth ones should just be redirected to the British one, since there is no difference in an encyclopedic register between written British, Australian, etc., other than a small number of regional dialect words, which our guideline suggest we avoid anyway. That would leave Commonwealth and American, and we don't need anything for those other than an small, no-flags, non-obvious notice, and definitely not two sets of "we own these articles" templates for the article and its talk page (the templates sets don't even match. [shaking fist] The entire pseudo-scheme is an exercise is nationalistic junk-waving. Yes, I will be preparing a TfD. RFC at WT:MOS already came to a consensus to clean up this mess, and it was muddied by a forumshopping and canvased counter proposal, with a present alleged, but procedurally invalid, result of a combined no consensus. 00:39, 20 March 2016 (UTC)