Either Option A:
A good title has the five following characteristics: recognisability, naturalness, precision, conciseness and consistency.The current, shorter title meets the first four. The proposed title sacrifices naturalness, precision* and conciseness for the sake of consistency. The current title scores 4/5; the proposed title scores 2/5: the current title wins. Opera hat (talk) 20:08, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
titles should unambiguously define the topical scope of the article, but should be no more precise than that. Opera hat (talk) 20:13, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Standard article naming conventions applyto categories too. WP:Naming conventions is WP:Article titles, and it is WP:POLICY as well. If applying a Wikipedia policy leads to a conflict with something like WP:C2D, which is merely a helpful description of common practice, the policy should take priority. Opera hat (talk) 21:24, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
The choice of article titles should put the interests of readers before those of editors, so whether it is a "massive time sink" should not be a factor. Opera hat (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)