|
[1] Why not relist? SpinningSpark 15:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
I did something stupid a few years ago and didn't understand the consequences. I asked for help to create a page about something the police developed in the 1960s called Operation Identification. It's an important topic deserving of a place on Wikipedia. Would you consider allowing it to be posted? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Identification — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trimster2 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
I'm a bit concerned about the result of this CfD. The discussion regrettably didn't pick up on the fact that not all the articles in the category are actually about African-American people: Amadou Diallo was from Guinea and only arrived in the U.S. in his 20s; Ousmane Zongo was Burkinabé; Abdul Razak Ali Artan was Somali; perhaps others besides. It's of course possible that these people considered themselves African-American, but ordinarily the term refers to people born in the U.S., naturalised citizens, and/or people who've lived there a long time. I'm not objecting to your close of course, which clearly reflected the consensus, but the WP:MR guidance is insistent that these things be discussed with the closer first, and as I don't usually pay much attention to CfD your thoughts on the best course would be appreciated. Thanks, – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I recently created this redirect. However, as you can see, there is a typographical mistake in it. Nothing links to this redirect. So, could you delete this redirect? Veverve (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Just an fyi - It looks like only half of them were renamed. - jc37 08:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Just wondering if you missed the updated functions of JJMC89's bot for CFD. Try the Retain part of WP:CFDW; it even posts the Old CfD templates. We just have to follow the syntax requirements on that page. – Fayenatic London 22:45, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I saw you listed as one of the mentors over at GAN. I am back to editing after a long absence, and I was wondering if you could take a look at a recent review I completed for Cyrtophora citricola. Any feedback is welcome and there is no rush. Thank you! -Pax Verbum 05:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
I noticed that you closed this discussion as delete on Sep 11. But 12 days later, the category still seems to exist (although it is nominated for speedy deletion by JPxG). I'm unfamiliar with CfD, so this confuses me. I know that with AfDs, an article link becomes red pretty soon after the discussion is closed as "delete". Any insights would be appreciated, thanks VR talk 17:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
Hey. The user you just banned is currently abusing their talk page and the edit history of that talk page. Sideswipe9th (talk) 02:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
I wanted to ask you about your closure of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 November 2#Category:Christian Heritage Party of Canada candidates in the 1988 Canadian federal election, because you treated the two parent categories differently from each other on grounds where there wasn't actually a difference between them.
Specifically, you decided to keep Category:Christian Heritage Party of Canada candidates for the Canadian House of Commons on the grounds that it also had list overview articles like Christian Heritage Party of Canada candidates in the 1988 Canadian federal election — but if that's grounds for keeping that category, then Category:Co-operative Commonwealth Federation candidates for the Canadian House of Commons also has to be kept, because list overview articles like Co-operative Commonwealth Federation candidates in the 1940 Canadian federal election were present there too. So such lists can't be grounds for keeping one category but not the other, if both categories had them — either they both have to be kept on the grounds of the list articles that they both have, or they both have to be deleted regardless of the list articles. We can't treat them differently from each other on grounds that didn't actually make them any different from each other. Bearcat (talk) 18:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Category:Government bodies in New Jersey with .gov websites is still populated, despite your closure of the relevant CfD as "delete". I believe the the other categories listed have already been deleted and depopulated. Alansohn (talk) 19:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) is wishing you a Merry Christmas!
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding ((subst:Xmas3)) to their talk page with a friendly message. |
A token of thanks
Hi Bibliomaniac15! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, ((u|Sdkb)) talk ~~~~~
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
Happy New Year from Wikimedians of Los Angeles!
To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. |
--JSFarman (talk) 02:07, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
LA to FA 2022 | |
---|---|
Dear Bibliomaniac15, You're invited to a zoom call, taking place on February 11, with the goal of improving the article on Los Angeles to Featured article status! I often find it daunting to approach the Big Subjects on my own—so if you, like me, want a time to sit down with fellow dedicated editors and tackle something important and complex, this is the zoom for you! I, unfortunately, have no way to transmit snacks over zoom; but I trust you to exercise good judgement and discretion in selecting snacks of your own. Hope to see you there—if you're interested, add your name here! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 00:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
oversight
will be renamed suppress
in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
|
Does "CVG", listed as one of the topics you deal with on the peer review volunteer list, stand for "computer video games"? I am asking because I would like to request feedback for a video game article that is on peer review. I would definitely appreciate it, for I have plans to nominate it for featured article candidacy. The game’s named Fallout, and the peer review can be accessed here. Of course, it is possible that CVG does not stand for computer video games. Don’t feel too inclined to provide feedback. Lazman321 (talk) 05:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I hope you are well.
If you have time, please could you help out some more at CFD? I think I am now WP:INVOLVED on all the ones at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Old_unclosed_discussions dated up to 31 January. – Fayenatic London 19:50, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
deletelogentry
and deletedhistory
rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928)The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
User:TyronMcLannister is vandalising the wikipage Chinese Australians by repeatedly removing Chinese Australians of partial European descent despite leaving out other wikipages Cornish Australians and German Australians that contain famous figures that are of mixed cornish and mixed german ancestry as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rooveaouravevo (talk • contribs) 05:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Religious community. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --evrik (talk) 02:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:06, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello Bibliomaniac15.
Following a discussion at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard, the minimum activity requirements for bureaucrats have been updated to also include the the recently updated minimum editing requirements for administrators (i.e. at least 100 edits every 5 years). This will be enforced beginning in January 2023. Should you no longer wish to volunteer as a bureaucrat you may request removal at SRP and.or let us know at WP:BN.
Best regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Your input is requested at the freshly-created bureaucrat chat. Useight (talk) 03:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I hope you are doing well. just saw your comment at the crat chat regarding Tamzin's RfA. In special:diff/1085684314, I was talking about the same RfA. Nice coincidence, eh? —usernamekiran (talk) 17:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).
|
|
Hello, I was looking at the Komodo dragon article, which is at this point a very old FA. (It's currently on the list at URFA.) I was actually on the article looking for information about the distribution of the current population, and this feels an area that the article currently lacks. There's isolated notes about a couple of populations and the infobox map, but no section discussing it. A section covering this sort of info for example, would be great, incorporating perhaps that last current paragraph in the main Conservation section. Aside from that, I was wondering if you had any thoughts on the quality of the article as it stands now, with relation to the FA criteria. There's some areas where the prose will need rewriting, but I am not sure if this is a large job or a small one. Thoughts welcome, and thank you of course for putting together this page back in the day. Best, CMD (talk) 08:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).
|
|
Hello I need to say that I like you so enjoy your day Mr. Bibliomainac fiveteen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usethename2 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).
|
Interface administrator changes
|
user_global_editcount
is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).
I think you need the first line as no consensus to delete per the bot instructions. Thanks for your work on closing CFDs! — Qwerfjkltalk 07:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
Hello hello. I hope this message finds you well.
The Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election ends soon, please vote. At least one of the candidates is worthy of support. --MZMcBride (talk) 14:50, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Happy bureaucratship anniversary! Hi Bibliomaniac15! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for bureaucratship. Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:21, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
I have nominated Komodo Dragon for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. CMD (talk) 16:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi Bibliomaniac15, I have started a bureaucrat discussion for ScottishFinnishRadish's RfA. It can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ScottishFinnishRadish/Bureaucrat chat. Thanks in advance. Acalamari 01:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
Sorry to disturb you but i need some help. I'm a non registered user writing from Italy. I don't know if you can help me but i hope that you can check if there's some mischievous activity going on on the italian wiki. The situation that i'm going to explain in a few lines is really quite strange. Strange to the point that an administrator user back in Italy is protecting or somehow allowing a set of "harmful" actions by a group of users.
A month ago i tried to correct some data on a page on wikipedia italy. The data that i corrected consisted of readily verifiable facts that could not result unknown to someone that has a knowledge of the argument described in the relative voice. The page that i tried to contribute to is just the page of "Scuderia Ferrari", a simple sport, historical page, not a big deal, at lest in my mind. So i expected everything to run smoothly. I was utterly wrong. I found myself in a subsequent series of "Godfather movie" situations.
A group of users, aided by some privileged ones, are modyfying the chronology of the page (at the code level) and de facto cancel every contribution (both at the page level, at the discussion level and are even able to erase themselves out of the chronology of the modifcations when they put out offensive remarks or make some other mischief). This is an inexplicably childish behaviour that acts against everything wikipedia should be, an open contribution tool that with cooperation tools aids the users to better the quality of the free hypertext. What i'm finding particularly wrong is the erase process of the discussion page. I had spent some time to put on the page all the things that could help in reaching an informed consensus about the subject ( corroborating facts, a set of bibliographical references, a set of questions that could allow the users to share their knowledge on the subject and focus on the key points in order to clear the argument). If one, in addition to rapid, vaguely justified if justified at all, rollback actions, cancels the chronolgy it becomes impossible even for future users to check the facts and take part in the discussion.
Wiki is a wonderfull instrument but, if you give it to the wrong people or if the wrong people have too much power, it becomes useless.
I tried to contact you, as an outside user administrator, because i hope that you could check what i say in an independent, maybe anonymous way, with a level of competency that is higher than the mere "edit war" conflict.
Thank you Alberto
P.S. I'll try also to make these things known to a random user administrator in Italy and hope for the best 151.68.183.39 (talk) 11:28, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
((rangeblock|create=yes))
or ((uw-ublock|contains profanity))
.I have nominated history of timekeeping devices to be today's featured article on January 1. You are invited to comment on the nomination by clicking here. Z1720 (talk) 02:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Would you mind closing the open discussions of September and early October at WP:CFD? It concerns only a very limited number of discussions but it gets about time they are closed. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:49, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
/64
to the end of an IP in Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.Hi. I noticed you are an ambassador for the Chinese language. I was wondering if you could add a sound file with the pronunciation of the Chinese language name in Chinese in the linked relevant page. Here is an example in the Swedish language page. Even though it is one of the most spoken languages in the world, in English few people know how it is called and pronounced in Chinese. It would be a great addition. Cheers! Thinker78 (talk) 22:00, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
happy new year |
---|
Thank you and the whole team today for the article, introduced (in 2008!): "This is the second Tzatziki Squad collaboration up for your scrutiny." - A timely contribution! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:14, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
today, I point at two singers I whose performance I enjoyed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
The RfA for MB has gone to a bureaucrat chat. Please join in the discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
Quick question about manually re-organizing the thriller drama category. (as discussed here). I've started slowly going through some of the categories just making sure the genres match prose in the articles and doing some mild cleaning here and there. Is the best way to do it do you think? I haven't done any category organizing in a while. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
Hi,I am anonymous user. बॉट has also added a description of Bangladesh Congress President Shirin Sharmin Chaudhury as acting president, even though he has not served as president.Others have added English to the official language of Equatorial Guinea. What should me do. please make a prudent decision.240F:31:3402:1:44C6:DFA8:21CE:17C0 (talk) 05:56, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
bot-related nonsense
|
---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
Please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pppery/Bureaucrat chat and join the discussion when you have an opportunity. Maxim (talk) 18:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to
note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Interface administrator changes
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
Hello! I am a Wikipedia IP editor and I wanted to draw your attention to the page which I came across "Qatari support for Hamas" is containing libelous material as the content of the page already exists on multiple different pages like "Hamas" and "2023 Israel–Hamas war". The page contains defamatory statement concerning the party involved. As per my knowledge It is a Wikipedia policy to immediately delete libelous material when it has been identified. Page revisions containing libelous content should also be removed from the page history. Libelous material (otherwise known as defamation) is reasonably likely to damage a person or company's reputation and could expose Wikipedia to legal consequences.
It is an extended protected page and I am an IP user, I hope you will attend my request. Thank you! 37.252.191.68 (talk) 05:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Category:Time travel in Star Trek has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).