< May 13 May 15 >

May 14

Category:Lutyens media

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 08:55, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Inappropriate category. This is based on a highly biased term, used to delegitimize opponents of the Indian government. --Soman (talk) 22:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, just a pejorative adopted by the ruling party and used in an ad hoc manner against journalists for publishing reports which might be critical of the government. Reliable sources don't tend to describe specific news organisations as "lutyen's media", the creator's spamming it across articles is a product of original research, unlikely to have any potential for appropriate use. Tayi Arajakate Talk 22:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Satellites by type

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 May 29#Category:Satellites by type

Category:Bill Richardson

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 09:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCEPON and WP:SMALLCAT, this category includes Bill Richardson, Electoral history of Bill Richardson (which should be redirected) and 5 articles about elections in which he participated or was speculated to participate. Having never held public office outside of Governor of New Mexico and having been out of politics for a number of years, it is unlikely that more articles will be written directly involving Bill Richardson. User:Namiba 17:51, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fair use images of Disney Theme Park posters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:Fair use images of Disney Theme Park posters to Category:Fair use images of Disney theme park attraction posters
Nominator's rationale: Two issues. The first is that "Disney Theme Park" should be "Disney theme park". The second is that the category says the posters are for "attractions", which should also be understood by the name of the category itself. Gonnym (talk) 17:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fair use images of movie posters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is probably a C2D, but since it is used on this many files, it's probably safer to have it go through the normal process. The parent category is Category:Film posters, the article is at Film poster and all but one sub-category uses "film posters". Gonnym (talk) 17:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians interested in hyperlinks

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Single-user category populated by a series of userboxes that don't actually express an interest in editing articles related to hyperlinks. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:23, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Swiss women Marxists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: double upmerge as discussed. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is a subcategory of "Swiss marxists" which contains the exact same contents, making this seem like an unnecessary disambiguation. Grnrchst (talk) 14:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I created the category as part of an unfinished (actually barely started) project of creating women Marxist categories to increase visibility of women within Marxism related pages. Here's the parent category for that project, which I clearly forgot to make the Swiss category part of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Women_Marxists I think that was a worthwhile project, but haven't had the time to pursue it so would have no objection to this page going. Will addd this parent category in case it is kept. BobFromBrockley (talk) 14:43, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with merging it to Category:Women Marxists, along with the others subcategories.--Grnrchst (talk) 08:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will tag these categories now. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are right. I'm adding these as a second merge target. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:48, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Disney Renaissance franchise

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 May 22#Category:Disney Renaissance franchise

Category:Leaders of Tower Hamlets First

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 09:13, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Short-lived political group that only ever had one leader and is now dissolved. A similar case to Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_May_6#Category:Leaders_of_People's_Alliance_of_Tower_Hamlets. (PATH was a split from Tower Hamlets First.) Bondegezou (talk) 08:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Tower Hamlets First councillors

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 09:15, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Short-lived political group, now dissolved. It had a number of councillors, but only one of whom was notable, Rabina Khan. Same rationale as Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_May_6#Category:People's_Alliance_of_Tower_Hamlets_councillors, which had the same sole notable member in R Khan. This category does have a second member, Abjol Miah, but that's only a redirect. Bondegezou (talk) 08:31, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Tower Hamlets Independent Group councillors

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 09:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Short-lived political group, now dissolved. It had a number of councillors, but only one of whom was notable. Same rationale as Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_May_6#Category:People's_Alliance_of_Tower_Hamlets_councillors, which had the same 1 member. (Sorry, I should've nominated this at the same time!) Bondegezou (talk) 08:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:US military ribbon symbolism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Military ribbons of the United States. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: These are already categorized in Category:Military awards and decorations of the United States. Like most US military awards, they are displayed on ribbons but what makes these awards "ribbon symbolism" I don't understand. (t · c) buidhe 07:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Colonel Weh with ribbons.
I think you're absolutely right that all of the medals have a corresponding physical ribbon depending on the uniform being worn, which is not defining. But the opposite is not true as not all ribbons have medals: many awards like Basic Training Honor Graduate Ribbon, Navy Ceremonial Duty Ribbon and Drill Instructor Ribbon are only ribbons. - RevelationDirect (talk) 16:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People associated with the Matterhorn

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:People associated with the Matterhorn to Category:Summiters of the Matterhorn
  • Propose renaming Category:People associated with the Eiger to Category:Summiters of the Eiger
Nominator's rationale: rename and purge per WP:OCASSOC. Purge people who did not reach the summit. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And I removed Sergey Kofanov from both categories, as there are no indications of any notable ascent. Zach (Talk) 12:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cimbalomists by nationality and 1 subcategory

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 09:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
The subcategory was not tagged yet. I have done that now. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC) [reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Precious Brilliant Golden Grain

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Recipients of the Order of the Precious Brilliant Golden Grain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Nondefining, discontinued and rather obscure Republic of China award. It does not have an article or category on zhwiki. None of the articles in the category more than mention the award. (t · c) buidhe 04:03, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Annulled Recipients of the Royal Victorian Chain

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (Something like Category:Annulled recipients of British honours before 1945 could be created, but I'm not confident that it would survive CFD.) Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Since the award recipients category was [[1]], I suggest deleting this as well. Revokation does not seem significant to any of the category members who are all royalty so I recommend against an upmerge. Category:Royal Victorian Chain should also be deleted as well; without this subcat it would only have two articles (the award and list of recipients), per WP:SMALLCAT. (t · c) buidhe 03:47, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cosmos Club members

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Deleting/Listifying Category:Cosmos Club members
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:TRIVIALCAT
The Cosmos Club is a private social club in Washington D.C. and these articles are split between making no mention and a passing mention of the club: no mention of the club is made in the articles for inventor Alexander Graham Bell, Senator Larry Pressler, and Representative Stanton J. Peelle while it gets only a passing mention with Mayor Louis Brownlow, architect Nathan C. Wyeth, and attorney David Carliner. Neither group seems defined by this association. I just listified the category contents right here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:The Kennel Club

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Deleting/Listifying Category:The Kennel Club
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT approaching WP:C2F, one eponymous article
The only things in this category are The Kennel Club and an image file that's already in the infobox of that same article. So this doesn't currently aid navigation but no objection to recreating it if we ever gets to 5+ articles. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More